Don’t forget to share it with your network!
Deven Jayantilal Ramani
VP, Softices
Artificial Intelligence
28 May, 2025
Deven Jayantilal Ramani
VP, Softices
In the world of Artificial Intelligence and automation, how systems communicate determines their efficiency, flexibility, and scalability. Two protocols often discussed in this space are Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Agent-to-Agent Protocol (A2A). While both facilitate interactions between AI components, they serve different purposes and operate in distinct ways.
Let’s break them down in simple terms.
MCP is a protocol or specification that governs how context is managed and shared with AI models, especially large language models (LLMs). It defines what information is retained, how it's structured, and how it can be used or updated during a session.
Think of it like a shared workspace where different models can access and update relevant information without needing constant direct communication.
MCP typically operates at the model interaction layer of an AI stack, managing what context is injected into model inputs and outputs.
A2A is a communication protocol that allows and directs autonomous agents (software agents or AI entities) to interact with each other. It defines the language, format, and rules for exchanging information and coordinating actions.
Instead of relying on a shared context, agents communicate explicitly, negotiating, delegating, or collaborating in real time.
A2A typically works at the middleware or orchestration layer, directing how agents cooperate, exchange data, and act.
Feature |
MCP (Model Context Protocol) |
A2A (Agent-to-Agent Protocol) |
---|---|---|
Focus | Context management for a single model or session | Communication between multiple AI agents |
Scope | Model-level memory, user preferences, state | Coordination, collaboration, or messaging |
Used in | LLMs, personal assistants | Multi-agent systems, robotics, decentralized AI |
Communication Type | Internal/contextual, Indirect (via shared context) | External/multi-agent, Direct (agent-to-agent messages) |
Best For | Consistent, static data sharing | Dynamic, real-time collaboration |
Complexity | Lower overhead for stable systems | Higher flexibility for adaptive systems |
Persistence | Often long-term (user profile, preferences) | Typically short-term (per interaction) |
Example | Shared database for AI models | Autonomous drones coordinating in real time |
Standards | Proprietary (e.g., OpenAI's system message formats) | FIPA ACL, JADE, ROS messages |
Yes, they can work hand-in-hand.
Imagine a customer support team powered by multiple AI agents. Each agent uses MCP to remember customer history. When agents need to collaborate (e.g., escalate a case or schedule a call), they use A2A protocols to coordinate the hand-off or negotiation.
Hybrid systems combining MCP for memory and A2A for orchestration are increasingly common in complex AI ecosystems. Together, MCP and A2A make AI systems smarter, more connected, and more useful.
As AI systems grow more distributed and personalized, expect tighter integration between MCP and A2A. Hybrid frameworks will allow agents to remember context (via MCP) while collaborating in real-time (via A2A).
This will be especially crucial in fields like:
We specialize in developing smart, scalable AI solutions that are tailored to your business goals.
Neither protocol is inherently "better" than the other. They solve different problems:
The right choice depends on whether your system thrives on consistency (MCP) or autonomy (A2A). As AI systems grow more sophisticated, understanding these protocols helps in designing smarter, more efficient workflows.
Whether you're an AI developer, strategist, or business owner, knowing how your systems "talk" can make all the difference.
At Softices, we design and build AI architectures that seamlessly integrate both MCP and A2A concepts, from smart assistants that remember you to agent-based systems that think and act autonomously.